data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd4ee/bd4eeebf3fe00bca8dc9bbd22837a0fcee13807b" alt=""
Bishop D'Arcy has confirmed in recent days the concern I expressed at the beginning, namely that UND never consulted him about the decision to invite and honor Pres. Obama, nor did they inform him before the public announcement that they had made these decisions. However, they did consult presidents of other Catholic universities and, oddly enough, other bishops. In my humble opinion, this shows a troubling disregard for the communion of the church, both local and universal. In her letter, Ambassador Glendon calmly, succinctly, and eloquently explains her reasoning in refusing this very high honor. I think it bears mentioning that by unwittingly dragging Ambassador Glendon into this controversy, Notre Dame demonstrated a distinct lack of charity toward her.
They certainly put Glendon in a bad position, and she is right to refuse to participate in the politicization of this graduation. It's a sad story. I'm not sure the principals thought this through. As some have pointed out, it became a watershed issue after much frustration.
ReplyDeleteI agree, Sharon. This reflects very poorly on Notre Dame's administration. A bad process is bound to lead to a poor decision.
ReplyDeleteI can't help but think that Fr. Jenkins asked other college presidents - but not Bishop D'Arcy - for the same reason a child will ask an older sibling, but not a parent, for permission to (break curfew, take the car keys, fill in the blank). He knew what the bishop's answer would be and didn't want to hear it.
ReplyDeleteI'm very impressed that Ambassador Glendon turned down the Laetare - regardless of circumstances, that had to sting at least a little. Whether Notre Dame planned beforehand to triangulate her appearance against President Obama's, or was taken by surprise at the outcry and came up with the idea post hoc, she was being used very disrespectfully.
That is a fair enough assessment, especially given that all Bp D'Arcy was asking them to do was to adhere to the guidelines agreed upon by the U.S. bishops in 2004.
ReplyDeleteYou are also spot on by identifying this as a triangulation strategy, a strategy in which they sought to use the use the leading lady of U.S. Catholicism as a pawn.
I say: Bravo, Ms.Glendon. Thank you for standing up for your Church and your principles. Maybe Notre Dame is finally getting the message? Let's hope.
ReplyDeleteIf the letter that is being circulated is accurate, it is well-written.