Sunday, March 16, 2025

Year C Second Sunday of Lent

Readings: Gen 15:5-12.17-18; Ps 21:1.7-9.13-14; Phil 3:17-4:1; Luke 9:28b-36

Sacrifice has been an act of worship, an act of thanksgiving, an act of petition across many times, places, and human cultures. Our first reading from Genesis tells of Abram (not yet Abraham), our father in faith, making such a sacrifice at God’s request.

Israelite sacrifices were but shadows of the ultimate sacrifice our Lord made for us on the cross. While God still desires sacrifice, in light of Jesus Christ, these are not bloody rituals involving select animals. Rather, God seeks bloodless self-sacrifice. Turning to Psalm 51, known as the Miserere, which is recited as the first Psalm of Morning Prayer for Friday during all four weeks of the Psalter, we make this offering:
My sacrifice, O God, is a contrite spirit;
a contrite, humbled heart, O God, you will not scorn1
We can’t leave it there, the psalmist, in the verse just before, says to God:
For you do not desire sacrifice or I would give it;
a burnt offering you would not accept2
Making external sacrifices is easier than offering God a contrite and humble heart, which consists not only of a willingness to change, but a deep desire to be converted, to be more conformed to the image of Christ. Lent is easily taken up with the static of what you give up, which can amount to giving God what He doesn’t want, withholding what God really desires.

We live in a society and culture in which sloganeering often passes for thoughtful discourse. As Catholics we seem enamored of a slogan that passes for a eucharistic theology: through the consecrated bread and wine, the Lord gives Himself to us “body, blood, soul, and divinity.” I do not dispute this in the least. However, it is vital to point out how woefully incomplete this is. The Eucharist is an exchange according to the economy of gift, not a repeatable magic trick.

When properly grasped, the sacrifice God desires happens in the Eucharist. Yes, He gives Himself to you whole and complete, but He asks you to freely offer yourself whole and entire, that is, body, blood, soul, and humanity. What this amounts to is not so much a commitment as it is the expression of a deep desire, or a desire for a deeper desire to love God with all your heart, might, mind, and strength by loving your neighbor as yourself.

Lent is a time of healing; a time to express your desire for wholeness, for holiness. Hence, Lent is a time to seek, with God’s help, to overcome disordered attachments. A disordered attachment is anything that gets in your way of loving God and neighbor. Hence, Lent is as much about what you take up as it is about what you give up, as much about what you do as what you choose not to do.

The Transfiguration altarpiece, Raffaello Sanzio, 1516-1520


Many years ago, in an Ash Wednesday homily, Passionist Fr. Harry Williams very forthrightly made the point I am trying to get across:
It is a pity that we think of Lent as a time when we try to make ourselves uncomfortable in some fiddling but irritating way. And it’s more than a pity, it’s a tragic disaster, that we also think of it as a time to indulge in the secret and destructive pleasure of doing a good orthodox grovel to a pseudo-Lord, the Pharisee in each of us we call God and who despises the rest of what we are3
Far from despising you, God loves you unconditionally. This is fundamental to Christian life. After all, "God is love."4

The point of Lent is conversion. To be converted means to be changed. Considering today’s Gospel, we might say to be converted is to be transfigured. This does not mean to be changed from one thing into something or someone completely different. Rather, it means to become who God, out of love, created and redeemed you to be. This is the process of sanctification, the process of becoming holy, becoming who you really are.

In its Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World, Gaudium et Spes, the Second Vatican Council made clear that “Christ… by the revelation of the mystery of the Father and His love, fully reveals man to man himself…” Far from annulling or cancelling our humanity, through His incarnation, we have “been raised up to a divine dignity.” Through the incarnation, “the Son of God has united Himself in some fashion with every [single person].”5

For a fleeting moment on the Mount of Transfiguration, Peter, James, and John saw Jesus as He really is and for who He really is. As the appearance of Moses and Elijah indicate, Jesus is the fulfillment of the Law and the Prophets, the full realization of God’s plan for creation. Listening is more than hearing. To listen is to heed. And so, Lent is a time to listen to Jesus, God’s chosen Son.

I say who Jesus is, not who He was intentionally. It makes all the difference in the world whether you think of Jesus as a historical figure who lived a long time ago, in a land far away, in an incomprehensible culture, or as being alive and, through the Holy Spirit, palpably present until He returns. Faith is an experience, not an assent to propositions and formulas, as important as these are in certain respects.

On the mountain, Jesus’ closest disciples not only encountered reality as it is meant to be, they saw things as they really are and how they will be forever. One might say, they beheld what is really real. We pray for this each time we pray the Our Father, when we ask, “Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done, one earth as it is in heaven.” And so, rather than seeing it as a dream deferred, Christians, as so many saints show us, live God’s kingdom as a present, if not yet complete, reality.

It is an article of Christian faith that when He returns, the Lord “will change our lowly body to conform with his glorified body.” According to Saint Paul, He will do so “by the power that enables him also to bring all things into subjection to himself.”6 What is that power? What that power is not and could never be is coercion, manipulation, or violence.

The power that enables Christ to change our lowly bodies to conform with his glorified body is the power of divine love, which, as the apostle sets forth in the previous chapter of his Letter to the Philippians in what is called the “Kenotic Hymn,” is self-emptying and self-sacrificing.7 Love cannot be forced.

Lent is a time for freedom. It is the to freely cooperate, out of love, with God in His on-going work of transfiguration.


1 Psalm 51:19.
2 Psalm 51:18.
3 Owen F. Cummings. “The Spirituality of Ash Wednesday.” Emmanuel magazine, 2007.
4 1 John 4:8.16.
5 Vatican Council II. Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World [Gaudium et Spes], sec. 22.
6 Philippians 3:21.
7 Philippians 2:5-11.

Friday, March 14, 2025

Memories and mortality

Here we are on the Eve of the Ides of March! The river of time keeps on rolling. March has been quieter here than January and February. This is not by design because nothing on my blog has ever been by design. While far less spontaneous than in my early years of blogging, I remain a pretty intuitive blogger (I don't claim the moniker writer).

This past week marked what would've been by maternal grandpa's birthday. 11 March 2025 was 110 years since the birth of Evan Lamar Stark. He died on 12 March 1976, just a day after turning 61. I was 10 years old at the time. Nonetheless, my Grandpa Stark and I were quite close. I have many memories of our times together, which are probably some of my earliest memories. We did interesting things, like like picking wild asparagus from irrigation ditches and putting our pickings into paper grocery sacks, taking it home, preparing it, and having some for supper.

Next will mark 50 years since his passing. His death was my first experience of someone dying. There was a young girl in our small town, Julie Rose, who died suddenly at about this same time. I remember going into the funeral home, to the room where my grandpa's body was laid out and seeing him. There was an overpowering smell of roses. Ever since, when I smell roses, my mind goes right back to that moment. These days, as opposed to when I was younger, it doesn't seem a bad memory.

Wild asparagus

12 March was also the one year anniversary of the death of Michael Knott. Knott also passed away at the age of 61. Post-mortem, he is usually dubbed an "alternative Christian musician." I suppose the "alternative" adjective is meant to denote that he was not a mainstream CCM musician à la Amy Grant, Michael W. Smith, The Newsboys, etc. Indeed, he was not part of that crowd.

What makes Knott's music Christian in my view is that it is real, grittier than the light pop stuff. In addition to recording 35 albums as part of various groups as well as solo, Michael founded two record labels: Blonde Vinyl Records and Tooth and Nail Records. In an interview, he said something that has stuck with me: "Basically, I'm a human being and I believe in Christ, period. It doesn't make my life rosy, it doesn't make my life terrible, it doesn't do anything with that. I know Christ." Michael, too, battled with alchohol. He did so honestly. I've used this in a homily. If you're interested, you'll want to check out Knottheads.

It bears noting that Knott was raised Catholic and died a practicing Catholic. During what turned out to be his last years, he served as an Extraordinary Minister of Holy Communion, taking the Eucharist to the elderly, the sick, and the homebound.

These seems fitting reflections given that on Ash Wednesday you are urged to consider your own mortality, invited to find life's meaning through the Paschal Mystery, the meaning of your own birth, life, and death. A good Christian understanding of death is, by, through, and in Christ, it is God's ultimate healing.

Being a time for repentance, Lent is a time for healing. Lent, as Trevor Hudson describes it, is "a time gift." Written long before Pope Francis famously calling "the Church as a 'field hospital,' concerned more with those who suffer than with defending its own interests, taking the risk of novelty, in order to be more faithful to the Gospel," our traditio for this Friday of the First Week of Lent is Michael Knott singing his song "Hospital"-

Saturday, March 8, 2025

The temptation of "all this power and glory"

Reading: Luke 4:1-13

"For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who has similarly been tested in every way, yet without sin" (Heb 4:15). I think perhaps the inspired author of the Letter to the Hebrews had our Gospel for today in mind when he penned this line. Indeed, during His earthly sojourn, the Lord was truly tempted, as any human being is. The big difference, as noted, is that He did not succumb to any temptation, He didn't fail any test.

You might say, "Sure, it's easy to resist temptation when you're God." Without ceasing to be God, Jesus became fully human. He's not half human and half divine. He is fully human and fully divine.

Christians, maybe especially Catholics, tend to get so hung up on Jesus' divinity that His humanity sometimes falls by the wayside. We know from the Gospels that Jesus experienced hunger, fatigue, anger, joy, sadness, the full range of human emotions and moods. You know what, from time-to-time, as He walked along the dusty roads of His native Galilee and later Judea, He had to step off the path go behind a bush. Shocking, I know!

The real question is, can someone be truly tempted if they simply do not find what s/he is tempted with in any way appealing? "Can I tempt you with a sriracha-covered apple?" In other words, if there is no possibility whatsover that said person could or would give in to the temptation, does that count as being tempted?

In light of this question, we must ask if there was any possibility that Jesus might've turned stones into bread to feed Himself, to seize worldly power to more effectively and efficiently establish the reign of God by coercive means through the state, or to hurl Himself, in a display of power putting His divine Sonship on full display, headlong off the parapet of the Temple, trusting the angels to catch Him before He hit the ground?



Sticking with the inspired author of Hebrews, I am going with there not only could've been, but must've been at least some attraction for Jesus in such temptations. Otherwise, these are not temptations, that is, tests. Are we simple spectators to a divine puppet show?

Since we're reading from Saint Luke's Gospel, the same goes for the Blessed Virgin Mary: she could've declined to bear God's Son, which, for her, was a risky proposition. It was her fiat, her "Be it done to me according to your word," her free consent that makes her so wonderfully special and worthy of our hyperdulia, our super-veneration. God desires this same emphatically loving response from each of us, a response so loving that it overcomes fear. Love is always a risk.

Getting back to the second of the temptations from our Gospel, it is a perversion of the Gospel to seek to impose the Lord's teaching by coercion through the state. This is the way of Caesar, not of God. Sometimes these are difficult to disentangle.

For several centuries beginning in the fourth century, the Church drank deeply from the well of the Roman imperium. We are still disentangling ourselves from it- Vatican II was a big step in that direction- but that is to digress. It seems a perennial temptation for Christians and even the Church at times to seek "all this power and glory," to fall for that with which the devil tempted our Lord.

This is not to argue against Christian involvement in politics. Far from it. Applied to political involvement, this has to do with the means to be used in service of achieving desired ends. Those things that are harmonious with the Gospel and that appropriately belong to politics must be argued for in a persuasive way and freely accepted by those who are governed and not simply imposed.

Integralism and so-called Christian nationalism are to be rejected on Christian grounds, rooted firmly in the teaching and example of Jesus Christ during His life and ministry. Like Christians of the earliest centuries and even many in recent centuries, we must be willing to live our faith not only in hostile situations but in situations of indifference towards what we believe. Doing the latter may ultimately prove more difficult.

Between Jesus' Ascension and His glorious return God's kingdom is only present in kernel form, here and there, wherever Jesus' teachings are freely lived out, motivated by love of God and neighbor, not fear of punishment. In fact, being motivated by love, agape, caritas, in many contexts means that love outweighs the very real fear of punishment. Wasn't this the case with Jesus Himself?

Friday, March 7, 2025

"... renew within me a steadfast spirit"

For Roman Catholics, Ash Wednesday and the three days that follow are something of a warm-up for Lent. What we call the three days following the start of Lent indicate this. For example, liturgically, today is Friday after Ash Wednesday. By contrast, next Friday is the Friday of the First Week of Lent.

Hearkening back to my homily for Ash Wednesday, Psalm 51, the Miserere, is the first Psalm of Morning Prayer for today. Along with Evening Prayer, Morning Prayer is a "hinge" hour of the Liturgy of the Hours. Morning and Evening Prayer are the hinges on which the other five hours (or offices) swing. At least in the United States, Morning Prayer and Evening Prayer, the hinge hours, are what deacons are obligated to pray.



There are times, especially during Advent and Lent, when I mix this up a bit and pray the Office of Readings and Night Prayer, thus maintaining my ordination promise to faithfully pray the Liturgy of the Hours with and for the people of God. I start praying the Office of Readings on the Fifth Sunday of Lent, when this office consists of reading from the Letter to the Hebrews, which is one of my favorite books in all of Sacred Scripture. This goes on through Holy Week.

It bears noting that except when a solemnity falls on Friday (I include Friday in the octaves of Christmas and Easter in this), Fridays throughout the year are days of penance. So, just as every Sunday, even during Lent, is a little Easter, each Friday is a little Lent. As my long history on this blog shows, I believe this practice to be very important.

In Psalm 51 we pray: "A clean heart create for me, God; renew within me a steadfast spirit" (v. 12). I don't know about anyone else, but the plea for "a clean heart" is for me a constant plea. But especially this Lent, I am asking God to renew in me a steadfast spirit. If I had to describe 2025 thus far in one word that word would be destabilizing.

Being destabilized is not all bad. I've been struggling through the gateway to a new season of life. This has meant discerning where it is the Lord is leading me, where He wants to me go. I am a bit like the rich young man, except I am no longer young and not terribly rich. Following Jesus always comes at a cost. What is the reward for following Jesus? Jesus!

Lent is a blessed season. With everything going on, all the rancor, vitriol, uncertainty, and, yes, what seems like destabilization, it probably seems to many people that Lent began early. This is understandable. For many, Pope Francis' health crisis only adds to the cloudiness of the present moment. It seems we all need to be renewed with a steadfast spirit.

Since I've already invoked Hebrews, let us not lose sight of this revealed truth: "Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever" (13:8). Jesus is Lord is much more than an empty, that is, political, slogan.

All political slogans are ultimately empty. All ideologies contain the seeds of their own destruction. They cannot deliver on their promises because what they promise is ultimate and politics are provisional, transitory. When it comes to political engagement, it is vital for Christians, eschewing ideology, to exercise prudential judgment. Being, in the words of Jesus, "shrewd as serpents" and, at the same time, "simple as doves" (Matt 10:16).

What is more worrisome about ideologies is that they can destroy their adherents and decimate socities. Christians need to resist those that seek to co-opt Christianity and/or the Church in the service of an ideology. I believe there is an inverse proportionality between how loudly a politician proclaims his/her Christian allegiance and the actual Christian nature of their politics in one way or another. If nothing else, such a stance lacks humility.

Don't get me started on politicians parading around with ashes on their foreheads. It would be far more convincing if they also sported sack cloth suits. So much American Christianity is performative these days. We put the scribes and Pharisees to shame. "Show your ash," indeed!

I think of a story of the late Msgr Lorenzo Albacete, who, on a visit to St. Peter's Square, pointed to the Egyptian obelisk and said something to the effect that it is flipping the bird to all the ideologies of the world. This is an interesting "take" to be sure.

It should come as no surprise that our traditio for this Friday after Ash Wednesday is the Miserere. Specifically, sung by The Sixteen, it is the Miserere composed by Gregorio Allegri most likely in the 1630s, during the pontificate of Urban VIII. It was intended to be used exclusively in the Sistine Chapel during Tenebrae services of Holy Week.

Wednesday, March 5, 2025

Ash Wednesday

Readings: Joel 2:12-18; Ps 51:3-6.12-14.17; 2 Cor 5:20-6:2; Matt 6:1-6.16-18

Our responsorial Psalm is Psalm 51. Known traditionally as the Miserere, this Psalm is penitential. Because Fridays throughout the year are days of penance (unless a solemnity falls on a Friday), the Miserere is the first Psalm for Morning Prayer for all four weeks of the Psalter.
Have mercy on me, O God, in your goodness; in the greatness of your compassion wipe out my offense. Thoroughly wash me from my guilt and of my sin cleanse me1
Only sinners, those who have done wrong, need mercy. Penance is how we cooperate with God in his redemptive work of setting the world aright. The world needs to be set aright because of sin, because of your sin and mine. God’s invitation for us to repent, God’s desire for us to reconcile with Him and one another, is a great kindness.

In his Letter to the Romans, Saint Paul insists that “all have sinned and are deprived of the glory of God.”2 In 1 John, the scriptures make clear that “If we say, ‘We are without sin,’ we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.”3

These scriptural passages make it clear that all of us need God’s mercy. In a long interview given at the beginning of his pontificate, the first question the interviewer, a fellow Jesuit, asked was, “Who is Jorge Mario Bergoglio.” To this, the Holy Father replied:
I do not know what might be the most fitting description.... I am a sinner. This is the most accurate definition. It is not a figure of speech, a literary genre. I am a sinner4
If you do not think yourself a sinner who needs a Redeemer, then you simply cannot be a Christian. Knowing one’s need for a Savior is fundamental to Christianity. On a personal level, it’s easier to discuss the perceived sins of others. But during Lent, God urges you to confront yourself. Looking back to last Sunday’s Gospel reading, Lent is the time for each of us to remove the beam from our own eye.5

Ash Wednesday Masses have no penitential rite at the beginning. This is due to the imposition of ashes. Receiving ashes, which we will do in a few moments, is the penitential rite for this Mass. To receive ashes in good faith, you need to be resolved to heed the words said as they are imposed: “Repent, and believe in the Gospel.”6

Repentance, which is a translation of the Greek word metanoia, refers to much more than acknowledging and being sorry for your sins, which is only the beginning of repentance, just as fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom.7 This where this “Gospel” you are to believe in comes into it. This good news assures us that perfect love drives out fear.8

To repent, then, means to literally transform your mind. Turning again to Romans, Saint Paul urges
not [to] conform yourselves to this age but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and pleasing and perfect9
It is the Spirit of God by the grace of God who transforms you. Nonetheless, a Christian isn’t content to keep living the way s/he lived before encountering Christ. Even in confession, one must not only express genuine sorrow for sin but be resolved, with God’s help, “to sin no more and avoid whatever leads me to sin.”10



Lent is a word from old English meaning “springtime.” This is the time of year when seemingly dead things “spring” back to life. A Christian life is a penitential life. Far from a life of misery, a penitential life is a joyful life, a happy life, a life immersed in the love of God, a life of loving your neighbor.

Lent isn’t for making yourself miserable in some piddling way for several weeks. Neither is it the time when you try to atone for your own sins. When you consider prayer, fasting, and almsgiving, which should characterize Christian life, focusing on one, like fasting, especially when it takes the form of giving something up, to the exclusion of the others, is an exercise in missing the point. What good is it, for instance, just to give up chocolate for Lent, especially when chocolate abounds at Easter?

Almsgiving is about what you are going to take up for love of neighbor. Right now, in a society in which more and more people are struggling in some way, what you do is probably more important than what you choose not to do. Prayer is opening yourself to God to be transformed so that you can discern God’s will and receive strength to carry it out.

Spiritual disciplines, of which prayer, fasting, and almsgiving are the foundation, are means to the end of loving God with your whole being by loving your neighbor as you love yourself.

The irony of Ash Wednesday, which is not a holy day of obligation (though it is obligatory to fast and abstain), should not be lost on any one of us. We hear from Saint Matthew’s Gospel not to draw attention to our prayer, fasting, and almsgiving and then come to Mass and receive a big black smudge on our foreheads.

It bears noting that receiving this smudge is not a universal practice even among Roman Catholics. In many places, as one comes forward with head bowed and has a few ashes sprinkled on the top of the head, as opposed to smeared on the forehead.

Regardless as to how the ashes are received, ashes mark you, not as a sinner, but as a penitent: a sinner who trusts in God’s love and mercy. As such, ashes are not worn as a sign of pride, let alone displayed in a righteous way. Neither are the ashes worn with shame, which would be a denial of the Gospel we profess to believe. They are worn humbly and with gratitude for what the Father as done for us in Christ Jesus. These ashes are a sign of hope, which is the flower of faith and love, agape, caritas, is their fruit.

Just as the penitential rite for this Mass is different, so is the dismissal. Rather than being sent forth to glorify the Lord by your life or to announce the Gospel, we pray that God will pour out upon those who bow before his majesty and who are committed to being transformed, “a spirit of compunction.” In this context, “compunction” refers to a feeling of guilt for one’s sins.11 Just as guilt is good if it helps you to repent, Lent is good if it helps you to repent.


1 Psalm 51:3-4.
2 Romans 3:23.
3 1 John 1:8.
4 Antonio Spadaro, SJ. “A Big Heart Open to God: An interview with Pope Francis.” America, Vol 209. No. 8
5 See Luke 6:41-42.
6 Roman Missal. Ash Wednesday.
7 Proverbs 9:10.
8 1 John 4:18.
9 Romans 12:2.
10 Act of Contrition.
11 Roman Missal. Ash Wednesday.

Saturday, March 1, 2025

Last Sunday before Lent

Readings: Sir 27:4-7; Ps 92:2-3.13-16; 1 Cor 15:54-58; Luke 6:39-45

I want to begin by making a clarification: the opposite of pessimism is optimism and optimism is not hope. One can be a pessimist and still have hope. I know because c'est moi. My hope is in God and in God alone. In the person of Jesus, God became human. God is one of us! As Saint Paul notes in today's "epistle" reading, it was by becoming one of us that He was able to die and rise. Jesus conquered sin and death. This is my hope.

Hope is made manifest in reality. Every Spring is a resurrection. Every morning that I awake is a resurrection. Every dark valley I have passed through and come out the other side verifies my hope. It also enhances my trust in the One who walks with me through valley of the shadow of death, which is a poetic way of referring to the One who walks with me on the journey of life.

As unrelated as it might seem to the other readings, as is often the case during Ordinary Time, when the lectionary seeks to explictly connect the Old Testament reading to the Gospel, thus, more often than not, leaving the epistle reading to fend for itself, there is a connection between our passage from the fifteenth chapter of 1 Corinthians and the Gospel.

Eternal life doesn't begin after physical death. To live on that basis is to wish more than hope. Rather, eternal life begins when, after having died and been buried in the waters of baptism, you emerge, come forth, arise. From that point forward, your life should look different, should be different, a change from how you previously lived, a life characterized by Jesus' teachings.

In short, as Christians, our lives should look redeemed. As Nietzsche intimated, too often Christians don't look or seem redeemed.

Lent starts Wednesday. Ash Wedensday to the First Sunday of Lent is kind of a Lenten warm-up period. Lent is the time to repent. While repentance starts with acknowledging and being heartily sorry for one's sins, it does not consist only or mainly of that. Let's eschew what Bonhoeffer famously called "cheap grace." To truly repent is to endeavor, with God's help, to live a more Christ-like life.



Like Job, Eccelesiastes, Proverbs, Psalms, the Song of Solomon, etc. Sirach is a wisdom book. As such, it contains divine wisdom. Our passage from this wisdom book urges you to be careful what you say, to be patient in tribulation, to pay attention to what others say and how they say it.

When it comes to judging, it is important to clarify things. First, we inevitably make judgments all the time. Guess, what, this is fine, even necessary. This even extends to matters of good and evil. Let's face it, you can't live very long without making a judgment. But, in ultimate terms, judgment belongs to God alone. Whether applied to yourself or others, what Jesus says is true: "from the fullness of the heart the mouth speaks." Speech provides a basis for judgment.

Be measured and prudent even when, maybe especially when, you're speaking critically on some matter about which you care deeply. By all means, speak the truth, call out lies, do so courageously, stand up for the downtrodden, warn others not to eat rotten fruit, but don't hate. Don't let your heart be contaminated with poison. Trust me, I understand that living in a toxic culture increases the risk of spiritual cancer. But you can take measures to ensure you don't get sick.

Here are some of Jesus' prescriptions to protect you from the toxicity that frequently engulfs us: prayer, fasting, and almsgiving, especially when the latter takes the form of serving others. Especially this Lent, we should all focus more on what we're taking up rather than what we're giving up. The moment we're living calls for much more than making ourselves uncomfortable in some piddling way.

Prayer, fasting, and almsgiving are spiritual disciplines. These are fundamental to living a Christian life. Of course, disciples follow the disciplines taught by their master so as to become more like the master. Because these disciplines are aimed at making us more self-giving, more self-sacrificing, they are meant to make us more like Jesus. Living this way is meant to make you joyful, truly happy, not miserable. The extent to which practicing these makes you miserable is the extent to which you and I need to repent.

Friday, February 28, 2025

"...take the humanity back into the center of the ring"

It's Friday. I am supposed to be in love or something like that. Actually, the idea of falling in love at this stage of my life isn't very appealing. At no point in my life was that something for which I was particularly well-suited. Let's face it, when it comes that, I am probably one of those people you're best steering clear of.

I spend a lot of time these daze worrying about the state of our humanity. It seems that we're not letting it slip away as much as we are just giving it away. It's almost as if our humanity is worth less than the artificial reality we can create or hope to create. It seems to me that we're not even getting a bowl of whatever it was Esau received from Jacob for our birthright.

It stands to reason that the creator is greater than its creation. Increasingly, reason has little or nothing to do with it. There are two axioms we seem to have to adopted. First, might makes right. Second, when it comes to technology, if it can be done it should be done. I'll add a third, we seem pretty at ease with the ends justifying the means. Many of the ends we are seeking don't strike my as particularly good ones (see axioms one and two).



I am a pessimist. Overly optimistic people bother me. Yes, this if often a matter for the confessional. This week in a thread on Blue Sky, I generated about as much social media buzz as I ever generate (which doesn't amount to much) by posting this:
In my teaching and preaching I make a hard and fast distinction between optimism and hope. They are not the same by an imperial mile. Hope is what remains when optimism fades
Karl Rahner's essay on Christian pessimism is good on this but pessimism, at least from my perspective, does not lead to optimism. But is doesn't necessarily lead to despair- though I do despair sometimes, more than I will ever publicly write about.

I am not sure one can have genuine hope, the theological virtue of hope, without pessimism. I think of optimism as believing things will either work out the way I want them to (something that in my case virtually never happens- sometimes for the better but sometimes not) or at least working out in my favor. Hope, by contrast, lies in total abandonment to God.

Even so, how often do we trivialize the Lord's prayer "Thy will be done"? How often do Saint Paul's words blithely tumble from our lips: "I am content with weaknesses, insults, hardships, persecutions, and constraints, for the sake of Christ; for when I am weak, then I am strong"? (2 Cor 12:9b-10 is the reading for Morning Prayer today- Friday, Week III of the Psalter). For a Christian, at least in worldly terms, losing is winning.

God's will is often, I would say usually inscrutable, at least it is to me. Of course, one needs to separate the "what" from the "why." Is everything that happens God's will and our "job" is just to deal with it? Another question, one taken up well in Woody Allen's 1989 movie Crimes and Misdemeanors as well as in the Psalms, is why do the wicked prosper? See Psalm 73. Yes, optimist, there are wicked people.

The hardest thing to teach children in catechesis is not to treat others as you want to be treated. Rather, it's to gently help them over the usually automatic assumption that if you treat people the way you want to be treated that they will always respond in kind. They won't, yet to follow Jesus is to persist anyway. Too often as Christians we talk of triumph at the expense of discusssing the this-worldly futility of living what Jesus teaches.

We know from scripture that Jesus did not want to be stripped, beaten, mocked, and crucified. Who would? Nonetheless, He abandoned Himself to the will of the Father, which meant putting Himself at the mercy of human authority, which is almost always merciless, even when, maybe especially when, claiming the name of Christ. Christian integralism is the equivalent of a rounded square.

Think of the absurdity of capital punishment in a "Christian" society. For that matter, even the whole of concept of retributive justice in a Christian society (see David Bentley Hart's "Further Reflections on Capital Punishment (and on Edward Feser)". Sticking with Rahner and taking some his thinking its logical limits, perhaps the whole concept of a Christian society this side of the eschaton is an abusrdity. I ran across this by Justin Steckbauer, written several years ago: "'To be Christian, is to be Truly Human' Karl Rahner’s Thoughts on a Darker Christian Realism.'

Anyway, all of the above is to be far more honest than I usually am here. It's amazing that we're closing out the second month of 2025.

I could go on in this vein, but I won't because, well, I want to end with a little hope. While I was tempted to post The Smith's song "Please, Please, Please Let Me Get What I Want" as our Friday traditio, I am going with a video, made to honor him after his death, of Joe Strummer singing Bob Marley's "Redemption Song." I have used this before.

Apart from loving The Clash and Strummer's post-Clash band The Mescaleros, I am choosing this for Joes' voiceover at the beginning. I think Bob would endorse that message.

Sunday, February 23, 2025

Does forgiveness forego justice?

Readings: 1 Sam 26:2, 7-9, 12-13, 22-23 Ps 101:1-4.8.10.12-13; 1 Cor 15:45-49; Luke 6:27-38

When we encounter such challenging teachings it is very important, on the one hand, not to just explain them away, reducing them nothing, thus failing to be challenged when it comes Lord's most difficult teachings. On the other, it is important to try understanding how this might apply under certain circumstances.

Unlike other some other passages, like saying pluck out your eye, cut-off off your hand, etc., Jesus in today's Gospel is not speaking hyperbole. He talking directly "To you who hear," that is, to anyone interested in following Him. Especially during His Passion, He taught this by His example.

Loving one's enemy should be a hallmark of being a Christian. Without forgiveness, the world is a dark, brutal, and violent place. Hate and resentment are evils a Christian must avoid at all cost. Christians intentionally do not live by the lex talionis, which demands an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. While we may at times understandably and even sometimes justifiably get mad, seeking revenge by trying get even is not a Christian value. Rather, we strive, we struggle to live by what Jesus taught so explicitly in passages like today's Gospel.

Loving your enemy requires to do good to him/her. Loving your enemy requires you to pray for her/him. What is an enemy? An enemy is someone who "has it out for you," someone who actively seeks to harm, oppress, and/or harass you. Saul was David's enemy. He hated David so badly that he lauched a military campaign to wipe out David and his small band of men.

Why did Saul want to kill David? Because he saw David as his rival for power. As history shows, tyrants hate rivals and critics and so seek to eliminate anyone who poses a challenge. The most permanent way is by killing them. Yet, when David had the chance to easily kill his enemy, who was waging mortal combat against him, he did not take it. Rather, trusting in God, David chose to spare Saul's life, which held in his hand.

For a Christian, loving your enemies is one of those things that should set you apart, make you stand out. It is what makes you salt and light for the world.

This brings up an important question: Are we to suffer injustice passively? Are we to ignore and not intervene or come to the defense or assistance of someone who is being treated unjustly? In the first instance, as with so many things, it depends. The lives of saints are rife with episodes of holy women and men enduring injustices and relying solely on God for vindication. Of course, due to the fact they're canonized saints, they were vindicated, even if, as in some cases, posthumously. When comes to myself, I need to be discerning.

the late Congressman John Lewis


I would say, even on Christian terms, injustice, especially towards the weak and vulnerable, should be challenged and resisted. Non-violent resistance is, at least for me, the most courageous form of resistance. Many people in the United States in the 1960s, like the late Congressman John Lewis, a founding member of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, set a beautiful example for later generations. Led by Dr, King, at its roots and to its very core, the Civil Rights movement was a Christian movement. So as not sound too triumphalist, one of the hallmarks of it being a Christian movement was that you didn't have to be a Christian to join in!

To be effective, resistance to injustice needs to be creative. It can be direct or indirect.

Often we want to fight fire with fire, to meet force with force. It usually takes a lot more courage, like the man in Tiananmen Square who stood in front of a tank, than attempting blow-for-blow confrontation. Through such actions, one uses one's humanity to appeal directly to the humanity of the other. The risk, of course, is that the one being appealed to may not respond in a human, let alone humane, way. As Christians, this is something we should understand deeply. Because the one engaging in this kind of direct resistance is willing to lay down his life for what is right on behalf of other people, it is an act of love, an imitatio Christi.

One of John Lewis' frequent refrains was, when faced with injustice, "never give up, never give in, never become bitter or hostile." He lived in the certainty that love, his love, would outlast the fear and anger of his enemies. He learned this through experience, by practicing it sometimes under life-threatening circumstances. Another beautiful thing John Lewis would say to younger generations as he grew older was, "make some noise and get in good trouble." Even so, he would also warn them never to hate, only to love, to do good, and, yes, to pray for those opposed to you, pray they will have a change of heart.

Friday, February 21, 2025

"One headline why believe it?"

So many thoughts, so many threads, so much going on. I am glad I returned to blogging because I can't take the pace of other social media platforms these daze. What is happening is nothing short of a media blitzkrieg. This is deliberate and done in the service of a far from transparent agenda.

Claims, counterclaims, counter-counterclaims, and so it goes into an infinite regress. "The common good" is just a phrase invoked on occasion. It seems to me that little is done in service of our common good.

Taken from Together for the Common Good, a U.K. Charity


What is the common good? The common good is that which seeks to enable and facilitate the flourishing of everyone. As such it is opposed to some socially Darwinistic society of winners and losers. The common good is the opposite of narrow and self-serving. It is the genuine ordo amoris as opposed to a narrow conception of this concept, which urges one to narrow rather than expand what might be called one's circle of concern. Especially if you're someone who's relatively well-off and comfortable, seeking the common good requires you look beyond your own interests and take account of the interests of those less well-off, especially those who are uncomfortable and struggling.

A few days ago, I listened to an episode of The Russell Moore Show featuring Robert Putnam ("Beyond Bowling Alone: Finding Community in an Isolated Age"). This is a vital conversation. Polarization has become the very nature of our politics. It is eating away at society and eroding our civilization.

Politics don't seem to any longer be about achieving ends that will enable flourishing. The means used to achieve desired ends, even when those ends aren't bad in and of themselves, seem to me aimed at creating further polarization, at winning and making losers. According to Putnam, whose body of work is worth enaging with, the answer is to connect with others and not primarily (or even secondarily) for political purposes. You may want to watch a recent film about Putnam, now showing on Netflix: Join or Die.

I love the old slogan of The Christopers: "It's better to light a candle than curse the darkness." While it is certainly better to light a candle, it is often easier and I would say sometimes necessary, to curse the darkness. But then, I don't want to promote the very thing I am arguing against. I was reminded this morning of a passage from the second chapter of Ephesians, the summary of which is verse 14:
For he [Jesus Christ] is our peace, he who made both one and broke down the dividing wall of enmity, through his flesh
I also want to point to something from Pope Francis' his recent letter to the U.S. Bishops, g that has been overlooked and that applies more broadly than to immigration. Found in section 7 of his letter, the Holy Father warns about the imposition of "the will of the strongest as the criterion of truth." Introducing the will of the strongest as the criterion of truth obliterates any authentic conception of the ordo amoris and, hence, the common good. It's hard to think of anything less Christian.

Please join me in praying for Pope Francis, who remains in hospital. He's battling pneumonia and a respiratory infection. When it comes to matters of the common good, to abiding by a proper conception of the ordo amoris, one rooted directly in the teachings of our Lord Jesus Christ, I believe we need his witness right now.

While it certainly lacks subtlety, our Friday traditio, sticking with my distinctly '80s vibe during this early part of 2025, our traditio is Tears for Fears, "Everybody Wants to Rule the World."

Sunday, February 16, 2025

Year C Sixth Sunday in Ordinary Time

Readings: Jeremiah 17:5-8; Psalm 1:1-4.6; 1 Corinthians 15:12.16-20; Luke 6:17.20-26

When giving blessings, priests and deacons often begin by quoting Psalm 124: “Our help is in the name of the Lord.” To which the one(s) receiving the blessing, along with everyone else present, responds with, “Who made heaven and earth.”1 More than a throwaway line, this is meant to acknowledge God’s goodness and power before conveying His blessing.

This is a gentler way of saying what the prophet Jeremiah, says in our first reading, when he insists that the person who puts his trust human beings is cursed while calling blessed the one who puts her trust in God. It is so easy to get caught up in human affairs that the Kingdom of God, which Jesus came to inaugurate and will return to fully establish, becomes something of an abstract idea instead of the concrete reality it should be for Christians. Our mission is to make the Kingdom present in the here and now even as we wait in joyful hope for Christ's return.

Our Gospel today, taking its name from the part of the passage that tells us Jesus “stood on a stretch of level ground,” is Luke’s Sermon on the Plain.2 Quite obviously, this is a parallel passage to Saint Matthew’s Sermon on the Mount. Not only is the ground more level, what Jesus teaches in Luke is a bit more plain.

There is no way to get around the difficulty of either our reading from Jeremiah or our Gospel. God’s kingdom as taught by Jesus seems like something of a bizarro world to us, that is a backwards world, the world turned upside down. Blessedness, according to Jesus, has nothing to do with worldly success. Rather, worldly success often endangers blessedness.

Who were the false prophets to whom Jesus referred? These were the ones who were the opposite of Jeremiah and the true prophets. False prophets told the people and those in power what they wanted to hear, not what they needed to hear. “All is well,” they said, while insisting nothing needed to change, embracing the status quo.

Jeremiah in the Sistine Chapel, by Michelangelo. Yorck Project, 2002. Public domain Wikipedia Commons.


Prophets called Israel back to fidelity to its covenant with God. As you might imagine, this often did not go down well. Jeremiah, born into a priestly family, was called by God to his prophetic ministry at a young age. His prophetic career spanned five decades. Over the course of that time, he was repeatedly persecuted.

Jeremiah’s prophetic message centered around calling out Israel’s idolatry, social injustices, and moral decay. It was part and parcel of the message of every true prophet to stand up for the poor and powerless to the rich and powerful. Jeremiah learned from a young age to trust in God, not in man. He learned this through many trials.

Members of Jeremiah’s family tried to kill him because he prophesied against idolatrous shrines. When he complained to God, the Lord told him, "Don't worry, it will get worse." As a result of resistance to his message and persecution, more than once, Jeremiah threatened to quit being a prophet. He was also beaten, imprisoned, and put in the stockade. Finally, Jeremiah was exiled to Egypt against his own will, where he likely spent the rest of his life.

Jesus himself was arrested, subjected to a sham trial, stripped, beaten, and crucified. In other words, being the prophet par excellence, Jesus experienced the treatment of a prophet, of one who challenged human power not only in the name of God but as true God from true God. His message is consistent with that of the Old Testament prophets, both major and minor, who challenged the status quo and the misplaced priorities of religious and political leaders.

What is the takeaway for us from all this? As Christians, we serve the poor and dispossessed and are committed to helping end their destitution. We feed the hungry, which is one of the corporal works of mercy. We both suffer with (that is what the word compassion means) and comfort those who weep, those who are scared, suffering, distraught.

While, according to Jesus, being despised on account of God’s Kingdom is a cause for rejoicing, if we read a bit further on in the same chapter of Luke, several verses beyond our Gospel passage, Jesus nonetheless teaches: “love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you.”3

We’ve heard a lot bit lately about the so-called ordo amoris, the order of love, which is set forth by Saint Augustine.4 In his recent letter to the U.S. bishops, rather than getting bogged down in a precise interpretation of an extra-biblical theological concept, Pope Francis insisted: “The true ordo amoris that must be promoted is that which we discover by meditating constantly on the parable of the ‘Good Samaritan,’ which is also found in Luke, “that is,” the Holy Father continues, “by meditating on the love that builds a fraternity open to all, without exception.”5

In a world torn by strife and rife with human division, this remains a prophetic message. The Parable of the Good Samaritan is a masterclass in love of neighbor. The man beaten, robbed, and left for dead is presumably a devout Jew, though this is not made explicit. It is safe to say that Jews despised Samaritans more than Samaritans despised Jews. Yet, Jesus made a Samaritan, who he sets in opposition to very devout Jews, perhaps only concerned with their own ritual purity, who cross the road to avoid the man beaten bloody, the protagonist.

Jesus taught this parable in answer to the question, “Who is my neighbor?” He ends this teaching by saying, “Go and do likewise," saying in effect, “Go and do like this Samaritan.” I think it's hard for us to imagine how humbling, perhaps even humiliating, this would sound to Jesus’ interlocutors. Hence, meditating deeply on this parable is precisely what will guide you to a rightly ordered love of neighbor, which, in the end, according to Jesus, is what truly matters.


1 Psalm 124:8.
2 Luke 6:17.
3 Luke 6:27-28.
4 Saint Augustine. City of God, Book XV, 22.
5 See Luke 10:25-37; Letter of the Holy Father Francis to the Bishops of the United States of America, sec. 6.

Saturday, February 15, 2025

Addendum on agape

My post for yesterday was longer than intended. In thinking a bit more about agape (i.e., self-giving, self-sacrificing, kenotic love- Christlike love), which for Christians is the supreme form of love, I offer a few more thoughts.

Probably the closest human analogy to divine agape is the love of a parent for her/his child. More specifically, the love of a mother for her child. In lamenting over the inhabitants of the Holy City, Jerusalem, in Matthew, Jesus says- "how many times I yearned to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her young under her wings" (Matthew 23:37). Or, God speaking to Israel through the prophet in Isaiah: "Can a mother forget her infant, be without tenderness for the child of her womb? Even should she forget, I will never forget you" (Isaiah 49:15).

This brings me back to 1 John 4:7-16, the passage in which the phrase "God is love" appears twice. The conclusion of this is: "Beloved, if God so loved us, we also must love one another" (1 John 4:11). It is through the love of God given us in Christ, which is poured into our hearts by the Holy Spirit, that we become children of God (see Romans 5:5).



As God's children, we are sisters and brothers. For Christians, in light of our baptism, water is thicker than blood. As the Holy Father notes in section 7 of his letter to the U.S. bishops, it is certainly thicker than and even transcends other identifications and affiliations we may have.

Love that is agape is profuse, abundant, copious, extravagant, freely given. It is outwardly not inwardly directed. At the beginning of the Kenotic hymn found in the second chapter of Philippians, Saint Paul urges Christians - "Have among yourselves the same attitude that is also yours in Christ Jesus" (see Phil 2:5-11).

Hence, God's love is not something to be held onto merely for my own sake. Rather, as Jesus gave Himself freely, I am to give myself freely.

This post was originally longer. However, it was quite repetitive of the post for which is was written as an addendum. So, I stuck with brief a amplification of the meaning of agape.

Friday, February 14, 2025

Orders of love and the order of love

Saint Valentine's Day remains a big day in the United States. This, despite the fact that on the Roman Catholic liturgical calendar 14 February is the Memorial of Saints Cyril and Methodius. Especially on Valentine's Day love is reduced to romance and romance to sex. On social media leading up to today, I have seen a huge number of memes that issue warnings like- "In 9 months you can be fishing with your friends or home changing diapers. Choose wisely this Valentine's Day." While I appreciate, on the one hand, the connection between and procreation so often lacking today and even, on some level, the humor, this helps prove my assertion.

Even the perfectly good Greek word eros becomes the adjective "erotic" and erotic becomes synonymous with sex, despite having an original meaning that goes beyond mere physical pleasure. As I write, the title of a Walker Percy novel occurs to me: Love in the Ruins.

Additionally, Valentine's day, like all other such days, become an occasion to spend money. For this day, money is dropped on chocolates, flowers, jewelry, lavish meals, and so-called "intimate apparel." Ads frequently consist of some variation of "show how much you love her by buying..." This despite the fact that Saint Valentine was a martyr. These days don't seem to require a rationale. Most people know little and care even less about some remote figure named Valentine. The same goes for the person in whose honor the next like-minded holiday is named after: Saint Patrick.

Did you know Saint Valentine is also the patron saint for people afflicted with epilepsy, and of beekeepers?

Saint Valentine relic in the church of Santa Maria in Cosmedin, Rome, photo by Dnalor 01 - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0.


As long-time readers know, I feel much the same way about the secular Christmas season that run parallel with the liturgical season of Advent and seeks to do away with the actual season of Christmas. This has nothing to do with me being opposed to enjoyment, fun, or celebration. I am in favor of all three. It just think when the roots of what is celebrated are lost, the metaphorical tree slowly dies. This dying has a profound impact on culture and, through culture, on society.

In the Song of Songs we read "love is as strong as death" (8:6). In and through Jesus Christ, love conquered death. This conquest shows that love is not merely as strong as death but that love is stronger than death. For a Christian, like Saint Valentine, this is everything!

In John 15:15 Jesus calls his disciples (there are not apostles in John's Gospel) philous, that is, friends. With eros, philia is another Greek word for love. Philia is friendship. For Aristotle, friendship was love's highest form. Elsewhere in the Johannine corpus, however, we read twice in the space of eight verses that "God is love" (see 1 John 4:8-16). Agape is the Greek word for love in this passage.

Agape refers to self-giving, self-sacrificing, self-emptying (kenotic) love. For Christians, therefore, agape is the highest form of love. It is important to note that "God is love" is not logically reversible. The inverse property of multiplication, which holds that 5x4=20 and 4x5=20, doesn't apply. Love is not God. God is love.

Agape does not obliterate or conquer eros and/or philia. Rather, agape enfolds them and deepens them. Dare I say agape "sanctifies" the other forms of love? When considered in a Christian way, because it is a sacramental sign of Christ's love for His Bride, the Church (errant spouse she may sometimes be), Christian marriages should show this. After all, sacraments are visible and tangible signs of Christ's presence in and for the world, n'est ce pas?

Any saint's day or, as with today, any saints' day, is a celebration of the God who is love and of the friendship we have with God through Christ by the power of the Holy Spirit. Understanding God as a Trinity of divine persons implies God is love. What is the Holy Spirit if not the love between the Father and the Son personified? This, in a nutshell, is why I am an unabashed double processionist. To be baptized is to be immersed, plunged, into the life of God.

__________________________________________________

Since love is today's theme, it is fitting to mention the recently revived ordo amoris. I have been more than a little bemused reading several criticisms of the Holy Father's letter to the U.S. bishops with regard to his treatment of the ordo amoris. The ordo amoris was brought into recent public discourse by the Vice President. He seems to have invoked is as a justification for a lot what the present administration is doing (or seeking to no longer do) with regard to immigration and foreign aid. In any case, these criticisms were basically how the Pontiff got Saint Augustine's theology wrong.

In his letter, I don't think Pope was attempting a precise theological exposition of Saint Augustine's ordo amoris. To me, he seems to attempt something of a corrective to it, at least to a lazy use of it in a political and self-justifying way. His corrective is an appeal directly to the teaching of Jesus Christ to whom, apart perhaps from the just love of self (which is maybe the cornerstone of the ordo amoris properly understood), as in "love your neighbor as yourself," such a construct would be foreign.

Specifically, the Holy Father points to the parable of the Good Samaritan, which was told in response to the question "Who is my neighbor?" He noted:
The true ordo amoris that must be promoted is that which we discover by meditating constantly on the parable of the "Good Samaritan" (cf. Lk 10:25-37), that is, by meditating on the love that builds a fraternity open to all, without exception" (Letter of the Holy Father to the Bishops of the United States of America, sec. 6)
Without a doubt, what Jesus teaches is hard to live, which is why a lot of theological effort is put into explaining it away, reducing His teaching to nothing but our own status quo in which conversion is neither desired nor needed. It is of this essence of Christianity to overcome an us-vs-them view of things.

__________________________________________________

Loving is difficult for many reasons, not least among which is that it requires understanding. It certainly requires understanding who is my neighbor. As the same passage from 1 John, cited above, notes, we can love because we have first been loved. Hence, I am to love in the same way Christ loves me. The love of Christ is an experience, the result of an encounter (see the first section of Pope Benedict XVI's first encylical letter, Deus caritas est, which letter also contains a wonderful exposition on eros, philia, and agape).

Our Friday traditio is HoJo asking "What Is Love?"

Monday, February 10, 2025

Memorial of Saint Scholastica, Virgin

Option to use readings for the Monday of the Fifth Week in Ordinary Time
Readings: Genesis 1:1-19; Psalm 104:1-2.5-6.10.12.24.35; Mark 6:53-56

Whenever I read the first creation account from Genesis 1, I am struck by two things. First, I am struck by the beauty of the poetry, which translates well into English. Given that, even as a Catholic, albeit a convert who grew up reading it exclusively, I think the King James Version brings this out best.

Secondly, I am struck by the evolutionary structure of this poem about creation. In it we hear of life evolving from its simplest to its most complex form, culminating in the creation of human beings, an event that happens beyond the end of our first reading.

The second creation account, which begins with the fourth verse of Genesis 2, is more primitive. According to “the Documentary Hypothesis” widely accepted by Old Testament scholars, the first five books of the Bible, that Christians call the Pentateuch, are a synthesis or, in more scholarly language, a redaction, of four distinct sources. This redaction, scholars posit, was likely carried out during reigns of David and Solomon around BC 1000.

The four sources are designated J, P, E, & D. These are the first letters of Jahwist, Priestly, Elohist, and Deuteronomic respectively. According to this hypothesis, the first creation narrative is P and the second is J. Given the stark contrast between the two, J would be the most opposite of P.

I think the poetry and precision of P account, the latter resulting in its evolutionary structure, give us some hint as to how faith and reason work together. Poetry represents beauty and evolutionary structure truth. Therefore, we have two of the three transcendentals: truth and beauty. Along with the good, the three transcendentals, while distinct, are inseparable and overlap in various ways.

In his seminal book, The Religious Sense, the Servant of God, Msgr. Luigi Giussani sought to show that
the nature of reason expresses itself in the ultimate need for truth, goodness, and beauty. These needs constitute the fabric of the religious sense, which is evident in every human being everywhere and in all times. So strong is this sense that it leads one to desire that the answer to life's mystery might reveal itself in some way (The Religious Sense, i)
Later in this book, Giussani notes that the human being is the point at which nature becomes conscious of itself (The Religious Sense, 25).



If human being is the point at which nature realizes itself, then Jesus Christ is the One in and through whom the human being realizes herself. As the Second Vatican Council’s Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World states it:
The truth is that only in the mystery of the incarnate Word does the mystery of man take on light. For Adam, the first man, was a figure of Him Who was to come, namely Christ the Lord. Christ, the final Adam, by the revelation of the mystery of the Father and His love, fully reveals man to man himself and makes his supreme calling clear (sec. 22)
In our Gospel, as Jesus and His disciples cross the Sea of Galilee, tying up at Gennesaret, we read that the people there “immediately recognized [Jesus]” (Mark 6:54). Their recognition caused them to bring all their sick to be healed by Him. Being healed certainly makes you feel more yourself.

While I don’t want to dismiss or dispute the reality of Jesus’ physical healings as set forth in this passage from Mark, I think it’s important to have some insight into their meaning, especially because those healed would still die someday. The meaning, I believe, is found in Mark 2, in the pericope of Jesus healing the paralyzed man.

Seeing the long line of people outside the house in which Jesus was performing physical healings, the man’s friends went up on the roof of the house. They somehow got the paralyzed man, who was on a stretcher, on the roof with them. They then lowered him down through the roof until he was right in front of Jesus.

Seeing the man, Jesus’ first words to him were “Child, your sins are forgiven.” Without a doubt, this caused dismay not only among the murmuring scribes, but the man and his friends. There was no empirical sign that anything was different. Knowing their thoughts, Jesus rebuked them. He then asked, “Which is easier, to say to the paralytic, ‘Your sins are forgiven,’ or to say, ‘Rise, pick up your mat and walk’?” He continued, “’But that you may know that the Son of Man has authority to forgive sins on earth’— he said to the paralytic, ‘I say to you, rise, pick up your mat, and go home.’” At which point, the man does just that (See Mark 2:1-12).

Jesus Christ doesn’t only reveal man to himself, He seeks to renew and restore, to revitalize, you by making you truly yourself- who God made and redeems you to be. In so doing, He renews nature by His goodness, restoring its truth and beauty as set forth in Genesis.

Saint Scholastica, who we venerate today, was the sister of Saint Benedict. Like him, she was a monastic. Cenobitic, or community-based, monasticism, of which Benedict and Scholastica are held to be the founders, is an intense way to live a fully human life, a Christlike life. Like Christ’s life, monastic life is eschatological, meaning it points beyond itself to the full realization of God’s kingdom. You, too, need to seek to be like Christ and to make Him present wherever you are. For where He is, there is the Kingdom, which is nature perfected by grace.

Sunday, February 9, 2025

Call and response

Readings: Isa 6:1-2a.3-8; Ps 138:1-5.7-8; 1 Cor 15:1-11; Luke 5:1-11

Taken together, our readings for this Fifth Sunday of Ordinary Time in Year C of the Sunday cycle are about vocation, being called by God. Vocare is a Latin verb best translated as to call. Audire in Latin means "to hear" whereas obedire, from which derive the word "obedience," means to listen to, to heed, to hearken unto, if you want sound traditionally "biblical" in English.

To be realized, a call needs a response. You can hear something and not respond. At least in terms of Christian vocation, choosing not to respond is always a possibility. Forcing you to do His will goes against God's very nature. No vocation is inevitable.

In our first reading from Isaiah, the prophet's call is mystically and dramatically set forth. Note that the call is given in the form of two questions: "Whom shall I send? Who will go for us?" The response? "Here I am... send me!" In the NABRE translation, note the exclamation point at end of the response.

As this passage from Isaiah shows, prior to that, the one who responds is not worthy of the call. Hence the Christian cliche, "God doesn't call the qualified. He qualifies the called." As a wise mentor once said to me, "You're not worthy. Get over it."

In our reading from 1 Corinthians, in addition to containing what we can call the earliest known creed, Paul writes obliquely about his own call and response, including his own unworthiness to be called as an apostle. Now, keep in mind, an apostolos is one who is sent. Again, in Christian terms, it means one who is sent by Christ to bear witness to what s/he has seen and/or heard.

I write "s/he" because, for scriptural reasons, Saint Mary Magdalene is revered as "the apostle to the apostles." Paul felt he was unworthy of his call because, as we know from the Acts of the Apostles, he was a zealous persecutor of the Church. He even had blood on his hands.

Our Gospel is Jesus' call of his first followers. Apparently, Jesus had convinced Peter, James, and John to let him use their boat to teach the people. It seems equally as apparent that, according to the inspired author of Luke, these fishermen not only heard, but listened to Jesus' message. After teaching, Jesus told them to put out into the deep water, a command they obey. After protesting that they had fished all night and caught not a fish, these fisherman also acquiesced when he told them to lower their nets into the water.

Used under Creative Commons License courtesy of Gospel Images


After hauling in their massive "catch," Peter realized that this was no ordinary man, not even the extraordinary man to whose teaching they listened, but someone to be heeded, hearkened unto, followed. According to this inspired account, "they left everything and followed him." Peter follows the pattern of heeding the call despite his declared unworthiness.

While Catholics don't generally use these categories, when it comes to salvation, there are what might be characterized as three movements: redemption, justification, and sanctification. Simplistically, all are redeemed by Christ. All who accept the redemption he wrought are justified. Those who are justified are now being sanctified, made holy, becoming more and more like Christ. At root, this is the basic Christian vocation: to be made holy through cooperation with God's grace, using the ordinary means of grace to become more like Christ through the ordinary circumstances of your life.

My calling is to be a deacon. What does it mean for me to be a "better" deacon? Is it even possible? Because I am a deacon by ordination, I am a deacon by God's grace. So, this is God's doing, not mine. Hence, my call is a call to serve others.

Unsurprisingly, when I look at the late Cardinal Avery Dulles' Models of Church, I am most drawn to the servant model. Like justification theories and even Balthasar's eccelsiology, it isn't about picking the "best" model. The Church, the Body of Christ, is an irreducibly complex, multifaceted, reality. And so, each "model" has its place and the Church can't be reduced to one. This is also why ecclesia semper reformanda is perennial.

Elsewhere in Luke's Gospel, Jesus tells the Tweleve "I am among you as one who serves" (Luke 22:27). One who serves in Koine Greek is a diaknon. And so, translated literally, Jesus says, "I am among you as a deacon."

Diakonia is not only for deacons. The call to service is inherent being a Christian. As I have written before, just as there is a priesthood of the baptized, there is also a diaconate of the baptized. In his first encyclical letter Deus Caritas Est, Pope Benedict XVI insisted:
The Church's deepest nature is expressed in her three-fold responsibility: of proclaiming the word of God (kerygma-martyria), celebrating the sacraments (leitourgia), and exercising the ministry of charity (diakonia). These duties presuppose each other and are inseparable. For the Church, charity is not a kind of welfare activity which could equally well be left to others, but is a part of her nature, an indispensable expression of her very being (sec. 25a)
This call to be charitable, that is, the call to self-sacrificing service, is not subject to political changes or governmental whim. It is a call to serve the least among us, to care for those who are most vulnerable to oft-changing winds.

Friday, February 7, 2025

"'Cause in your dreams/The demon screams..."

It seems like Christmas and New Year's were eons ago. But celebrating the Presentation of the Lord in the Temple reminded me that last Sunday only marked 40 days since Christmas Day.

The past week has been calmer for me personally. I am grateful for that.

It's dawning on me now more that ever that I am really not very good at life. During my lectio yesterday morning, for which I am using Laurence Devillairs' The Philosophy Cure: Lessons on Living from the Philosophers, I contemplated matter of suffering.

I have to say, in my life most of the suffering I've endured is of my own making. And that in the big scheme of things, I have not suffered much. Nonetheless, whatever form it takes, suffering is, well, suffering. It's an unavoidable part of being human.

It has also become very clear that I have a hard time being light-hearted and just letting myself be free. It's as if I need a burden to carry, a worry to tarry. While I regret the self-absorption that depressive suffering sucks me into, I don't regret any compassion I've ever shown to anyone. Helping other people carry their burdens is something of a vocation for me. Though, these days, ministry doesn't afford much by way of this.

Something Saint Paul wrote in his Second Letter to the Corinthians has slowly become my favorite scripture passage:
Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of mercies and God of all comfort, who comforts us in all our affliction so that we will be able to comfort those who are in any affliction with the comfort with which we ourselves are comforted by God (1 Cor. 1:3-4, NASB)
It just so happens that this particular passage serves as the scriptural reading for Sunday, Evening Prayer II, Week I of the Psalter.


Here's what I wrote in response what I read yesterday- bear in mind these are just notes: "Suffering: a good topic for martyr's memorial [yesterday was the Memorial of St. Paul Miki & Companions, Martyrs]. Descartes philosophy was not disembodied. His whole philosophy is usually reduced to one Meditation [really, Part 1 of Meditation II in Meditations of First Philosophy]. Optimism is not hope. Hope is the cross. Optimism is denial or avoidance of the cross. God is not cruel. Hesed as lovingkindness."

Descartes' Meditation VI in his best know work, as DeVillairs reminded me, "contains another foundational experience of the self - one that is mediated by suffering." This resonates with me. I never feel more alone than when I am suffering. When suffering, I never feel more by myself and, hence, never feel more myself. Empathy helps me. I find some consolation in someone who was been through something akin to what I am experiencing sharing their own ordeal with me. Sympathy can be nice, too, as long as it doesn't become prescriptive and pietistic.

Here's what I wrote as a kind of resolution for the day yesterday: "Enjoy today- be lighthearted." Easy, right?

In reality, my life is good and I shouldn't complain, but sometimes I do. Sometimes I often complain. In his autobiography, G.K. Chesterton wrote: "I hope it is not pompous to call the chief idea of my life; I will not say the doctrine I have always taught, but the doctrine I should always have liked to teach. That is the idea of taking things with gratitude, and not taking things for granted."

So, this is not merely put on a happy face and pretend all is always well. How I feel isn't always up to me and it is, at least in part, constitutive of my person. Looking at the world through gray-tinted glases much of the time, I see a lot of beauty, a lot of grace in the grit of life. Sunflowers appearing in unexpected places is for me a miracle.

I also tend to take a lot for granted. This is especially true when it comes to people. There are people to whom I need pay far less heed and those who I need cherish and heed much more. As I spent time, years ago now, with my Dad as he lay dying on a gray, cold January day, he told me how he realized that there wasn't much in life that truly matters. It is, therefore, those things do matter that should be my focus.

Lately I have been on a Thompson Twins jag. Because it seems somewhat in tune with what I've written, "King For One Day" is our traditio for this first Friday of February:

I've heard it said
Or maybe read
Only money makes
The world go round

But all the gold
Won't heal your soul
If your world should
Tumble to the ground

Year C Second Sunday of Lent

Readings: Gen 15:5-12.17-18; Ps 21:1.7-9.13-14; Phil 3:17-4:1; Luke 9:28b-36 Sacrifice has been an act of worship, an act of thanksgiving...