Blogito ergo sum! Actually, as N.T. Wright averred, "'Amor, ergo sum:' I am loved, therefore I am." Among other things, I am a Roman Catholic deacon. This is a public cyberspace in which I seek to foster Christian discipleship in the late modern milieu in the diakonia of koinonia and in the recognition that "the Eucharist is the only place of resistance to annihilation of the human subject."
Sunday, October 29, 2023
For the love of neighbor
This week's readings only require a short-take. I will provide mine in a numerical sequence:
First, probably the reason Jesus spent so much time talking to the Pharisees is that they were the Jews who were most like him. In other words, they encouraged their fellow Jews to practice their religion. Far from being bad thing, religion is a product of faith. It isn't very likely that all Pharisees were opposed to Jesus.
Second, what is at the root of most of Jesus' disputes with the Pharisees as set forth in the Gospels, bubbles to the surface in today's Gospel. What is this root? Mistaking means for ends. The Law is but a means to the end (singular) of loving God and neighbor. While I could go all Pauline on you, I will refrain, except to say that only Jesus fulfilled the Law in both letter and spirit.
Third, among Jewish teachers before, during, and after Jesus, the teaching handed on in this pericope isn't stunningly new. After all, it is right there in the Law! What eventually emerges in Jesus' teaching as something of a departure, but not in this passage, is his answer to the question "Who is my neighbor?" But, again, when one considers today's passage from Exodus, you can see this, too, isn't such a dramatic departure.
Fourth, "neighbor" is not an abstract concept. I think the Spanish word, closely related to our English word "vicinity," gets at this better. Vecino indicates clearly someone in close physical proximity to you. This is also true of the Greek word that transliterates as plésion, from the adverb plésios, meaning "near," "close to."
Therefore, as the Beatles sang, "All You Need Is Love." Add to this something Saint Augustine preached in what we have cataloged as Sermon 110: "Love God and do whatever you please." Not too surprisingly, the back end of this sentence is usually omitted: "for the soul trained in love to God will do nothing to offend the One who is Beloved." For good measure we might throw in Chesterton's "Let your religion be less of a theory and more of a love affair." This is probably enough to chew on.
While lovely in the abstract, this teaching is quite difficult to apply. You see, there are two big obstacles- me and other people. It's easy to love "humankind" or "humanity" (increasingly we seem to have no love for humanity, either our own or anyone else's). "Humankind" is an abstract category or, as in logic and mathematics, a set that includes all human beings.
To love everyone does not necessarily mean you love anyone in particular. To love no one in particular is the same not loving anyone. Many, far too many, who have claimed to love humanity have harmed and oppressed others out such "love."
I will end by going a bit Thomistic. Love is not a feeling. It's an act of your will. This means love is choice, not chance. Like all choices, the choice to love or not to love has consquences.
Sunday, October 22, 2023
Year A Twenty-ninth Sunday in Ordinary Time
To paraphrase Saint Paul from our first reading, the Gospel is not primarily a matter of words, but of the Holy Spirit’s power.1 It is the Spirit’s power that convicts us, at the deepest level of our being, of the truth of the Gospel, the mystery of faith, the Paschal mystery. The Paschal mystery is the Gospel. It is the mystery of faith. What is the mystery of faith? Christ has died, Christ is risen, Christ will come again.
As Christians, the Paschal mystery needs to transform and convert us in every aspect of our lives. For a true disciple, faith in Christ is what integrates every aspect of our being. Faith cannot be compartmentalized. If we use the analogy of making a cup of tea, faith in Christ is not the tea bag that is plunged into the hot water, coloring it, altering both its smell and taste.
Faith is the water into which the bag is plunged. After all, you can drink water without tea, but you can’t drink tea without water. In baptism, we are plunged into the very life of God- Father, Son, and Holy Spirit- the one God, living and true, whose essence is agape, which is self-giving love.2
In addition to being the Twenty-ninth Sunday in Ordinary Time, today is the Memorial of Pope Saint John Paul II. Without a doubt, John Paul II is one of the great evangelists the Church has ever produced. Papa Wojtyla always reminded us that to know Christ Jesus is everything. In the arithmetic of existence- Jesus+nothing=everything.
Saint John Paul II started his first encyclical letter, Redemptor Hominis- “Redeemer of Man”- promulgated a mere five months after he became Pope at the relatively young age of fifty-eight, with these stirring words: “The Redeemer of man, Jesus Christ, is the center of the universe and of history.”3 In the first chapter of the Letter to Colossians we read:
He is the image of the invisible God,As indicated, everything was not only created through Christ but for him. It is Jesus Christ who holds everything together, making creation a cosmos that can be studied, understood, marveled at, even if never completely comprehended; a cosmos and not chaos.
the firstborn of all creation.
For in him were created all things in heaven and on earth,
the visible and the invisible,
whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers;
all things were created through him and for him.
He is before all things,
and in him all things hold together4
I begin this way not only because I think it is important to remember Pope John Paul II, but because it is easy to lose sight of Jesus’ divinity, especially during this long season of Ordinary Time as we read through Saint Matthew’s Gospel in a semi-continuous way. In this season, we tend to focus rather minutely, and for good reason, on Jesus’ interactions as makes his way from Galilee to Jerusalem. It is easy to take for granted the gift of faith that enables us to believe and to profess, “Jesus is Lord.” According to the apostle Paul, any genuine confession of Jesus as Lord can only be made by the power of the Holy Spirit.5 Making faith one of the theological virtues, that is, a gift from God.
Our first reading, from that section of Isaiah, reckoned to be from the section of that book known as deutero or second Isaiah, written during Israel’s Babylonian exile, shows how God used a pagan emperor, Cyrus, to release his people from captivity. Thus, we see one instance of how God directs history, as in Colossians, as in Redemptor Hominis, towards his ultimate purpose: opening the way of salvation through Jesus Christ to all who believe.
While God works in the world through history, neither anyone nor anything can stop God’s purpose from being realized. In our Gospel today some Pharisees who were hostile to Jesus (not all Pharisees were) thought they had devised the perfect trap into which Jesus would fall. By asking him if Jews should pay taxes to their Roman occupiers, they thought that if Jesus said they should be paid he would be discredited in the eyes of his fellow Jews. On the other hand, if he said Jews should not pay taxes to the Romans, they could denounce him to the Roman authorities, which they ultimately did but only in Jesus’ own time.
It is important to point out that Jesus did not just split the difference, in effect, cutting the baby in two. In his response to this hypocritical question, he demonstrated the power of the Truth. In the end, what the Jews were asked to give to the Roman emperor already belonged to the Roman emperor. Considering this, the question becomes not so much what belongs to God as it is who belongs to God? As to what belongs to God, the answer is simple- everything that is.
Today’s Gospel should also remind us, as Jesus’ disciples, we are first and foremost citizens of God’s kingdom, a kingdom not of this world. In this vein, after the collapse of communism in Russia and Eastern Europe, in which history shows he played a big part, Pope John Paul II consistently warned that rampant consumerism, which is not so much atheistic as idolatrous, holds as many, if not more, perils as atheistic communism.
Towards the end of Redemptor Hominis, Saint John Paul II wrote:
The Father's eternal love, which has been manifested in the history of mankind through the Son whom the Father gave, “that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life…”6And so, for each of us today and every day, the question is To whom do I belong? In his wisdom and lovingkindness, having made us in his image, God leaves the answer to that question to you and to me. The true answer is revealed not so much through our words as it is through our actions and even through our inaction.
1 1 Thessalonians 1:5.↩
2 1 John 4:8.16.↩
3 Pope John Paul II. Encyclical Letter Redemptor Hominis. Holy See. 4 March 1979.↩
4 Colossians 1:15-17.↩
5 1 Corinthians 12:3.↩
6 Redemptor Hominis; John 3:16.↩
Monday, October 16, 2023
Year I Monday in the Twenty-eighth in Ordinary Time
Our reading from the very beginning of Saint Paul’s Letter to the Romans is a good short course in Christology. This is because, in this passage, the apostle establishes Jesus as being both human and divine. Some four hundred years later, at the Council of Chalcedon, this is defined as what we now as “the hypostatic union.” In Greek, hypostasis means that certain something that makes something what is and not something else.
In in the one person of Jesus Christ, two hypostases- divine and human- are joined in the words of the Council of Chalcedon
without mixture, change, division, or separation; the difference of natures not being removed by their union, but rather the propriety of each nature being preserved and concurring in one person… so that he is not divided or separated into two persons, but the only Son, God, the Word, our Lord Jesus Christ, and one and the same person1Paul is very clear about his vocation, his calling. He was called to “bring about the obedience of faith” among the Gentiles, that is, among non-Jews. Of course, being a Jewish person as well as a Roman citizen who likely spoke Greek, Aramaic, Hebrew, and probably passable Latin while also being multi-cultural, made Paul ideal for carrying out the evangelization of Roman Empire.
What is the surest sign of Jesus’ divinity, according to the apostle in this passage? Being resurrected from the dead. This, in Paul’s view is what “established him in power.”2 Of course, to be resurrected, he not only had to have a body, to be incarnated, but to die.
Jesus, too, in our Gospel, points to his own, then future resurrection as the surest sign of his divinity. He does this response to people coming to see him perform signs and miracles, to witness the magical mystery tour of the itinerant carpenter from Nazareth.
Especially in the Synoptic Gospels (i.e., Matthew, Mark, and Luke), Jesus is quite ambivalent about the miracles he performs. In this passage from Saint Luke’s Gospel, the Lord minces no words- despite the signs and wonders he performs, his own people, his fellow Jews refuse to believe. This dovetails nicely with our Gospel from Matthew yesterday.
The parable of the Wedding Feast is a thinly disguised allegory. The king is the Father. The king’s son is Jesus. The servants sent out call the invited guests to the wedding banquet are the prophets and the invited guests the Israelites, the Jews, God’s chosen people. What about those from the highways and byways? That’s us, the gentiles. The idea that we somehow secretly belong to one of the ten lost tribes, besides being historically laughable, defeats the Gospel.
As for the man lacking the proper clothing, he’s that one that believed, who accepted the invitation and came but was not really convinced or converted. Perhaps his fault is that he lives a life of presumption. Presumption holds that, in the end, God’s mercy wins out. Therefore, how I live doesn’t really matter. This is the one who is convinced that being a “pretty good” person will suffice in the end. And so, one needn’t bother too much about adhering to Church teaching handed on in Scripture and Tradition.
Worldly wisdom, after all, is often easier, more practical, perhaps more common sensical whereas adherence to Christian teaching requires something of you. As Chesterton sagely noted: “The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting. It has been found difficult; and left untried.”3
Getting back today’s Gospel, a similar dynamic is in play. Jesus tells his fellow Jews that they will be judged by gentiles who believed, the Queen of Sheba and the Ninehvite, who heeded those who we less than Jesus on much less evidence. In context, these are shocking words. They are meant to provoke repentance and belief in the Son of God.
We’re very much in the same situation as those Jesus addresses in today’s Gospel. During this year of Eucharistic Revival, we can either reduce Christ’s Real Presence to only that in consecrated bread and wine, thus limiting our understanding of the words and gestures of consecration, like those seeking a sign, as some kind of magic. Or we can seek arrive at an ever deeper understanding that in giving himself to us body, blood, soul, and divinity, Jesus asks nothing less from us than the pledge of our body, blood, soul, and humanity.
The Communion Rite is the Catholic altar call. Our “amen” to the words “the body of Christ, the blood of Christ” is not just a profession of belief that we’re receiving him- though it is that- it is also pledging ourselves to him, a renewal of baptismal promises, the firm intention, with the help he gives us in and through this sacrament, “to sin no more and avoid whatever leads me to sin.”4
The high point of Mass is the not consecration of the bread and wine, which, by the Holy Spirit’s power become for us the body and blood of Christ. The high point of the Mass, the point to which it all builds, is the Communion Rite. This is when, together, we receive the One who makes us what we are- the Body of Christ, the Church, those whom not only in but through Christ is made present. Having received him, we are then sent forth, dismissed, to “Go and announce the Gospel of the Lord,” to spread the Good News of Jesus’ resurrection from the dead, the message of Alleluia to those who live in darkness and the shadow of death.5
1 From the Chacedonian Creed.↩
2 Romans 1:4.↩
3 G.K. Chesterton. What’s Wrong with the World, Part I Chapter 5- “The Unfinished Temple.”.↩
4 From The Act of Contrition.↩
5 Roman Missal, Concluding Rites; Luke 1:79.↩
Monday, October 2, 2023
Memorial of the Guardian Angels
In today’s Gospel, Jesus refers to the “angels in heaven” of the “little ones” about whom he is speaking. The Lord speak of “their angels.” The existence of angels is a truth of the faith, a matter of revelation. Angels are wholly spiritual, that is, non-corporeal beings. The Catechism neatly summarizes the Church’s teaching concerning guardian angels:
from infancy to death human life is surrounded by their [angels'] watchful care and intercession. Beside each believer stands an angel as protector and shepherd leading him to life. Already here on earth the Christian life shares by faith in the blessed company of angels and men united in God1One of the first prayers most Catholic children learn is the prayer to one’s Guardian Angel:
Angel of God,It is a time-honored practice to recite this prayer twice a day. Once in the morning and once in the evening.
my guardian dear,
to whom God’s love commits me here,
ever this day be at my side
to light to guard, to rule, and guide
These teachings can seem childish. But, taking a cue from our Gospel, it is a teaching that requires child-like faith to believe and to practice that belief. It is also important to locate the Church’s teaching on angels within the beautiful tapestry of Church doctrine. Besides, there something very natural about positing an order of beings between human beings and God.
In the Creed we profess belief in “God the Father almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, of all things visible and invisible.” As spiritual beings, angels belong to the invisible order of creation. Nonetheless, the relationship of angels to the world is both material and spiritual. Angels, while personal beings, are “principalities and powers” of the cosmos by virtue of their spiritual nature.
Angels do not intervene in the world by arbitrary decision or in a way contrary to their real nature. Angels remain under the authority of God almighty. There is a vast difference between angels as written about in Scripture and explained by Catholic doctrine and angels as conceived of by those who adhere “New Age metaphysical” teachings. Though the two are often mixed
A guardian angel is a spiritual being who protects you. As today's liturgical memorial attests, liturgy being prima theologia (i.e., first theology), it is safe to say that belief guardian angels is part of the Church’s doctrinal patrimony. While belief in angels is dogmatic, belief in guardian angels is not
In terms of angels at work in the world bringing about God's purpose, consider how instrumental the Archangel Gabriel was in the Incarnation of God’s only Son. Looking at both the Infancy Narratives of Saint Matthew and Saint Luke, Gabriel appears to both Mary and Joseph. Consider too how, in the wonderful deutero-canonical Book of Tobit, Tobias hires a companion to accompany him on his journey to retrieve some money of his father’s from a relative. Unaware, Tobias hires the archangel Raphael, who, while an archangel, very much acts as Tobias' guardian. In the end, Raphael brings both spiritual and physical healing, enabling Tobias not only to return safely to his father and mother, but gain him a wife and restore his father Tobit’s eyesight.
In a Catechesis for a Wednesday General Audience way back in 1986, Pope Saint John Paul II, who wrote about his devotion to his guardian angel, taught:
the angels, as pure spirits, not only participate in the holiness of God himself, in the manner proper to them, but in the key moments they surround Christ and accompany him in the fulfillment of his salvific mission in regard to mankind2To end, let us pray together in faith:
Angel of God,
my guardian dear,
to whom God’s love commits me here,
ever this day be at my side
to light to guard, to rule, to guide
1 Catechism of the Catholic Church, sec. 336.↩
2 Pope John Paul II. General Audience. 30 July 1986.↩
Sunday, October 1, 2023
Year Twenty-sixth Sunday in Ordinary Time
Currently, repentance is a word little used and little understood. To repent does not mean to be sorry for your sins. Contrition is our theological word for that. This is why in the Sacrament of Penance, before imparting absolution, the priest asks the penitent to make an act of contrition. This vocal prayer is meant to be an outward sign of the penitent’s inner sorrow for his sins.
Repentance means to change your behavior. In a Christian context, it means to have a change of mind, a conversion, which causes you to turn from sin and start acting rightly. Indeed, repentance is the fruit of genuine contrition. It is addressed in the formal Act of Contrition, when we say to God- “I firmly intend, with Your help, to do penance, to sin no more, and to avoid whatever leads me to sin.”
Note, too, that penance, while related, is also distinct from repentance. Penance consists of those good and pious acts we undertake to help reverse the effects of our bad and impious actions. As the doctrine of indulgences teaches, it is something like the Christian way of balancing karma. Hence, a truly Christian life is a repentant life, that is, a life filled with the good fruits grown and nurtured in the life of the Christian by the grace of God. The main source of this grace is the sacraments, particularly the Eucharist.
Far from a dismal gray existence, living in a repentant manner does not mean playing life so as not to lose, sitting on the sidelines, or endeavoring to stay out of “the world.” A repentant life is a vibrant, happy, joyful life. It is a life played to win; a life prepared to take risks for God’s kingdom. It is a life of gratitude lived in response to God’s love given us in Christ; a Spirit-filled life. Repentance is the theme of our readings today from Ezekiel and Matthew.
Our reading from Saint Paul’s Letter to the Philippians consists of what is often called the “Kenotic Hymn.” “Kenotic” is an English adjective of the Greek verb kenosis. Kenosis, in Greek, even in modern Greek, simply means “to empty,” as in Paul’s phrase translated as “he emptied himself.”1
The passage that comprises our second reading consists of the first eleven verses of the second chapter of the apostle’s letter to the Church in ancient Philippi. New Testament scholars insist that verses seven through eleven were not originally composed by Paul. Rather, he used the words of an ancient Christian hymn sung in the Church and known to his correspondents to make his point about what it means for Christians to be Christ-like.
This hymn gets to the very nature of God and is vital for us to grasp: It is the very nature of the tri-personal God to be self-emptying for the Other. This is the only way to understand the revelation “God is love.”2 It has been noted that the Incarnation of the Son of God is an event “so earth-shattering that it enacts something akin to the psychoanalytic concept of trauma” on the world.3 The Incarnation is the most profound instance of God-being-God. During the Creed, we bow as we profess our belief that “by the Holy Spirit [He] was incarnate of the Virgin Mary, and became man.”
It is because “he was in the form of God” that Jesus “did not regard” his divinity “as something to be grasped,” or, more literally to be made use of in a debased manner, or even to steal. Getting to the point, the Son’s self-emptying was not despite his divinity but precisely because of it. Too often when dealing with this critical New Testament passage, it is understood and communicated in such a way that it is made to seem as if Christ’s self-emptying is somehow at odds with his divinity rather than the surest sign that he is “true God from true God.”
It has been noted that “Jesus’ disclosure shows that in his very nature God is self-effacing.” This observation stands in direct contrast to what is often taken for traditional Christian orthodoxy, which “has thought of [God] as the opposite; majestic, glorious and triumphal,” or even as angry, easily offended, and vengeful.4 Thinking of God as anything other than self-emptying/self-effacing is a remnant of the paganism that seems inherent to fallen humanity.
A kenotic, or self-emptying, life is a repentant life. It is repentant because it requires you, according to the apostle, not to look out first and foremost for yourself but to “humbly regard others as more important than yourselves.”5
Not only is a repentant life the only life worth living, in the end, it proves to be life itself. Elsewhere in Saint Matthew’s Gospel, Jesus clearly teaches- “whoever wishes to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for my sake will find it.”6 This paradox is the beating heart of Christian faith.
In his song “Paper and Fire,” John Mellencamp captured this powerfully:
He wanted love with no involvement
So he chased the wind, that's all his silly life required
And the days of vanity went on forever
And he saw his days burn up like paper in fire7
1 Philippians 2:7.↩
2 1 John 4:8.16.↩
3 John Milbank, Slavoj Žižek, Creston Davis, Paul’s New Moment: Continental Philosophy and the Future of Christian Theology, 7.↩
4 Hugh Montefiore, “Jesus and the Revelation of God,” 111.↩
5 Philippians 2:3-4.↩
6 Matthew 16:25.↩
7 John Mellencamp, “Paper and Fire.”↩
Sunday, September 17, 2023
From your heart
I hope to get back to posting reflections on the Sunday readings and the Friday traditio as well as some occasional posts on matters of interest.
________________________________________________
What struck me about today's Gospel is how reluctant everyone is to discuss it in full. While to allegorize a parable of Jesus is to take a risk, I think the parable of the wicked servant is one that almost requires an allegory. As allegories go, this one seems pretty straightforward to me.
One can only call it something like the parable of the forgiving or merciful God if the parable is truncated. I think Paschal's distinction between the God of the philosophers and the God of revelation still very apt. I can't grasp not only bracketing out parts of the Bible (this is not say context doesn't matter), or even of the New Testament, but those words handed on that are put in Jesus' mouth. God won't be domesticated and we shouldn't make God in an image more conducive to how it seems to us things ought to be.
The subject of the parable, the leading character, if you will, is clearly the servant who was forgiven a huge debt he could never repay and, when threatened by the king to whom he owed the debt, begged for mercy, received mercy, and then did not extend mercy to a fellow servant who owed him a much smaller amount. According to the allegory that comes to mind, the king is God. The servant who owes the great debt is the individual Christian. Here it is necessary to deviate from the allegory a little, but only a little.. According to a certain understanding of Christ's atonement, the debt we owe wasn't merely forgiven. It was paid in full by God's Son. I think such a take is not only congruent with but perhaps even implied by this passage.
Based on the above, any time a Christian refuses to forgive a brother or sister from the heart, s/he becomes the wicked servant. Something about being forgiven our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us. Or, to borrow words from our first reading: "Forgive your neighbor's injustice; then when you pray, your own sins will be forgiven" (Sirach 28:2).
Jesus use of "brother" reminds us that this pericope is still part of the Church Life Discourse, the fourth of five discourses found in the Gospel According to Saint Matthew. Therefore, this has an ecclesiological overtone.
Forgiveness is hard. It's even hard when the offense is not egregious. At least in strictly human terms, when the sin is grievous, it may be impossible. But the Christian needs to forsake karma and both accept and offer grace. How else will God's kingdom be realized? If Christians do not live to make the Kingdom of God a present reality, then what is our mission? Doing so often makes us look foolish and naïve. It also makes us somewhat vulenrable. Isn't vulnerability what the Incarnation is all about?
Especially in this age of social media, I don't know how many times I've seen a tweet or a post that begins something like "I am a Christian, but..." Then the author goes on to describe some unforgivable trespass that they are not only not going to forgive but one for which they want vengeance and demand karma do its thing to the perpetrator. Based on our Gospel, it is more accurate to say "hellbent on avenging." Indeed, seeking vengeance is to bend toward hell and away from God's kingdom.
Forgiveness, especially for heinous offenses, is no easy thing. It is work and hard work at that. It's so hard that we probably can't do it without God's help. It's just this kind of endeavor that brings about conversion, change and even transformation into the likeness of Christ.
I think Saint Ignatius of Loyola's concept of indifference is very useful when it comes to forgiving others. "Indifference" in the Ignatian sense is not apathy, being uncaring or passive. In a short article on indifference according to Ignatian spirituality, Marina Berzens McCoy defines it beautifully: "the capacity to let go of what doesn’t help me to love God or love others—while staying engaged with what does."
Let's be clear, forgiveness really only pertains to those instances when you have really and truly been wronged. Let's be equally clear, refusing to do the work forgiveness requires doesn't help you love God or others. My willingness and desire to forgive, even if I may not yet be able to fully do so, is what requires my engagement because it helps me love God and others.
In his address "On Forgiveness" published in the book The Weight of Glory, C.S. Lewis summarizes what it means, in the words of Paul from our second reading, to "live for the Lord"- "To be a Christian means to forgive the inexcusable because God has forgiven the inexcusable in you."
Sunday, September 10, 2023
Year A Twenty-third Sunday in Ordinary Time
A temptation that must be resisted when hearing a reading like our first reading from Ezekiel is to think that God is laying on you the same prophetic mantle he laid on Ezekiel. If you’ve ever read the Book of Ezekiel, you are grateful for that. Rest easy. God isn’t burdening you with all the sins of the Church.
It is also important to keep in mind that our uniquely Christian scriptures, which we collectively call “the New Testament,” are addressed exclusively to the Church, that is, to Christians both collectively and individually. Remember, that we fulfill our baptismal call to evangelize by bearing witness to Christ through our adherence to what scripture teaches, which is clarified and amplified by the Church’s magisterium throughout time.
Saint Paul, in our reading from his Letter to the Romans, provides instruction on how Christians living in the ancient capital of the Roman Empire were to comport themselves. In all ages, Christians are to live imitatio Christi- in the imitation of Christ. In this passage, the apostle does nothing more than resound the words of our Lord: “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”1 In his own teaching, the Lord himself simply cites the Law from Leviticus, which enjoins: “Take no revenge and cherish no grudge against your own people. You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”2
It is notable in the verse from Leviticus that it implies one’s neighbor is limited to one’s fellow Israelite. While the Law demands that non-Israelites not be mistreated, it seems to draw a line between an “us” and a “them.” For a Christian, there is only us. There is no them. This is the point the apostle makes in our reading when he writes “love is the fulfillment of the law.”3 Being a disciple of Jesus requires you to be a neighbor to those you encounter, especially the one in need, not just to your fellow Christian.
Our Gospel for this Sunday is taken from that section of Matthew’s Gospel known as “The Discourse on Life in the Church.”4 This Gospel was written in and for an early Christian community that from its inception had been largely and, perhaps in the beginning, exclusively Jewish. But the Gospel was written at a time when this community was experiencing a crisis.
Primarily, the word “crisis” is a medical term. In this context, “crisis” refers to a “turning point for better or for worse in an acute disease or fever.”5 Even when used in a more general context, a crisis is a turning point. One thing is clear: after a crisis, you’re never the same. You are either better off or worse off.
What was the crisis the Matthean church was undergoing? It was experiencing a significant influx of Gentiles, that is, non-Jewish converts. But even before this crisis, because the Church, then as now, was composed of people, conflicts undoubtedly arose. Therefore, structures of reconciliation were necessary to deal with both deviations from the community’s standards and to deal with injuries that members inflicted upon each other.
It is an unhealthy community that seeks to avoid or paper over conflicts. As a priest of my acquaintance once asked, “What do you call marriage in which there are no arguments?” I had to reply that I didn’t know. He answered, “You call a marriage in which there are no arguments dead.” This is true, too, of the Church, the Bride of Christ.
These structures, of course, needed to be in conformity with Jesus’ teaching, which means they are done out of love and have increased charity as their objective. This brings us back to our verse from Leviticus- “take no revenge and cherish no grudge.” Seeking revenge is perhaps the most anti-Christian thing you can do.
Elsewhere in his Letter to the Romans, Paul teaches “Do not repay evil for evil… do not look for revenge…Do not be conquered by evil but conquer evil with good.”6 Let’s not overlook the Spiritual Work of Mercy that bids us to suffer wrongs patiently.
Revenge is a distortion of justice because it is merciless. Without mercy, justice is reduced to revenge. Another thing to be avoided is cherishing your grudges. Holding a grudge is what refusing to forgive looks like. It has been noted that holding a grudge (i.e., refusing to forgive) is like drinking poison and waiting for the other person to die.
As our Gospel indicates and the Church’s experience over the last few decades clearly shows, addressing critical issues directly isn’t just important, it is vitally necessary. Injustice and grievous harm cannot be ignored. But I think for most of us, many issues that arise within the context of the Church don’t rise to that level. Many can be resolved by broaching the issue straightforwardly and charitably with each other.
For several years I led a group for Catholics who were estranged from the Church and who were interested in coming back or, if they hadn’t stopped practicing, were interested in discussing their concerns. After a while, what struck me was how resolvable many of the issues we discussed were. Occasionally, our bishop at the time, John Wester, would come to our meeting.
I remember one woman sharing with the bishop some unpleasant experiences she’d had with a disagreeable priest. The woman did not accuse this priest of anything more than not being very nice to her. After speaking for a while, she asked the bishop what he thought about the experiences she had described. He said something like, “I think you’re giving that priest way too much power over your life. I am sorry that happened to you, but don’t let it keep you away.”
Not every issue needs to be addressed. Some wrongs are best born patiently, as anyone in ministry can tell you. Of those issues that need to be addressed, many are best addressed person-to-person, cara-a-cara, brother-to-brother, sister-to-sister, sister-to-brother. Serious issues should be brought to the attention of leaders, who, as leaders, are required to follow through. Otherwise, it is a failure of leadership, a phenomenon with which we’re sadly all too familiar.
During this year of Eucharistic Revival, there is a lot of talk about Christ’s “Real Presence” in the Eucharist. Of course, the Church teaches that Christ is really present in the Eucharist, which refers to the whole of Mass. According to the Church, Christ is present in four ways. The first way he is really present, taking a cue from today’s Gospel, is in the gathering of the baptized - “where two or three are gathered in my name, there I am in the midst of them.”7
I think Christ’s Eucharistic presence in the gathering of the baptized assumes and is even somewhat dependent on whether we are reconciled to one another and whether or not we are a reconciling community. Nothing is more fundamental to the Christian faith than forgiveness and reconciliation. This is why, earlier in Matthew’s Gospel, in the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus teaches:
Therefore, if you bring your gift to the altar, and there recall that your brother has anything against you, leave your gift there at the altar, go first and be reconciled with your brother, and then come and offer your gift8This is one of those things we should search our consciences for during the Penitential Rite at the beginning of Mass.
It should not be lost on us that God loves everyone, even sinners! Thanks be to God! At its very outset, the teaching we hear in our Gospel today is given to deal with conflicts in a manner that facilitates not just forgiveness but reconciliation and conversion. This evangelizes because it can cause non-Christians to marvel at the Church, saying, in the words of Tertullian, “look how they love one another.”9
1 Matthew 22:39; Romans 13:9.↩
2 Leviticus 19:18.↩
3 Romans 13:10.↩
4 Byrne, Brendan, SJ. “Matthew” in The Paulist Biblical Commentary. 944..↩
5 Merriam-Webster Dictionary online "crisis".↩
6 See Romans 12:17-20.↩
7 Matthew 18:20.↩
8 Matthew 5:23-24.↩
9 Tertullian. Apologeticus, chap. 39.↩
The scandal of God's love
Romans 8:35.37-39 Once again, I am reflecting on our reading from Romans. These inspired passages are vital for Christian faith. The beau...
-
It is time to introduce yet another member of my community of the heart. Yesterday I mentioned that the theology of Hans Urs von Balthasar w...
-
Recently I have been asked several times about remarriage and the permanent diaconate. In the present state-of-affairs, which may eventually...
-
Because my parish celebrated Mass in the evening instead of in the morning today, I was able to assist my pastor at the altar on this Memori...






